The Importance of Gender-Neutral Spaces

by Tom Wiley

We are thrilled to announce that The Rockefeller University has opened its first gender-neutral restroom, just outside of the Faculty Club! It may not occur to the well-meaning cisgender person that the women’s or men’s room sign can actually serve as a barrier to entry for transgender, non-binary, and gender-non-conforming (TGNCNB) people.

Have you ever needed to pee and done six or seven passes by the gendered bathroom door and were dying to go in but were too afraid that you may get verbally harassed—or worse?  Instead, you think, “that’s okay—I can hold it for the next seven hours until I get home from work.” For many TGNCNB people, this scenario is routine life.

In 2013 The Williams Institute, part of UCLA’s School of Law, did a survey of TGNCNB people in Washington, DC, about harassment in public restrooms. “Overall, 65 respondents (70 percent) reported experiencing one or more of these problems. Eighteen percent of respondents have been denied access to a gender-segregated public restroom, while 68 percent have experienced some sort of verbal harassment and 9 percent have experienced some form of physical assault when accessing or using gender-segregated public restrooms.”

This survey was done before passage of North Carolina’s HB2 bill that specifically targeted TGNCNB people, preventing them from using the bathroom that corresponds to their gender identity. This bill was passed on March 23, 2016, and repealed March 30, 2017. For many, especially cisgender folks, North Carolina put the struggle for transgender rights in national the forefront, as the bathroom bill garnered significant media attention. Now, speaking from personal experience and having been verbally harassed and barred access to bathrooms (though never at Rockefeller!), I would not be surprised if a new survey would show that the percentage of TGNCNB people who have been harassed using bathrooms would be significantly higher since the advent of the HB2 law. Even though the law was repealed, lasting damage is there.

For those of us who are fortunate enough to live in New York City, an anti-discrimination law was passed in the early 2000s that bars employers from disallowing TGNCNB people from using facilities that match their gender identity. This year, the GENDA law was passed and extended that protection to all TGNCNB people in New York State. Despite protections, harassment often goes undeclared.

In our current political climate, we need action. The Rockefeller University has exhibited true support the TGNCNB population by creating a necessary gender-neutral bathroom facility, which benefits the TGNCNB population at Rockefeller as well as transgender visitors, including the many speakers and guests PRISM has hosted at our events. This action sets a standard for universities and other employers.

IMG_7767.jpg

Sexual Misconduct Climate Survey

Rockefeller University issued a climate survey in November 2018 to gather data to combat sexual misconduct better. The PRISM board met with Rockefeller officials to ensure that that LGBTQ+ demographics were recorded. Previous studies have shown that LGBTQ+ people experience higher rates of sexual misconduct, suggesting that special attention may be needed to protect this class. Language was added to the survey that allowed people to identify as straight, lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, transgender, nonbinary, or as other sexual and gender minorities.  

Aaron Mertz honored with oSTEM Global STEM Service Award

At oSTEM’s 8th Annual Conference in Houston, Texas, PRISM co-founder Aaron Mertz was awarded the oSTEM Global STEM Service Award for his advocacy work for LGBTQ+ scientists.

This award is presented to an active member, alumnus/a, chapter mentor, or organization leader of oSTEM who has demonstrated a strong dedication to oSTEM, LGBTQ people in STEM, and STEM education. They are an outstanding role model for the future of our community. They are accomplished in their academic or professional lives and they regularly advocate for the full inclusion of people of all marginalized identities. They are committed to and continually strive to understand the most effective methods for reaching equality for all people.

You can view his acceptance speech here. Congratulations, Aaron!

Fall Social – November 2018

We hosted a social in November for new members of the Rockefeller University community to meet existing PRISM members, and the board discussed plans for the coming year. More than 50 people attended. Our next social will be held in April, with an invitation to follow.

NIH behind on LGBTQ data

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has an interest in promoting diversity among researchers it funds to increase the quality of scientific research and mitigate disadvantages and discrimination toward underrepresented groups. According to the “Notice of NIH's Interest in Diversity,” these groups include underrepresented racial and ethnic minorities, people with disabilities, people from low income backgrounds, people from educationally disadvantaged rural and urban communities, and women “at senior faculty levels in most biomedical-relevant disciplines.”

Although consideration of diversity by the NIH is critically important and should be extended to additional funding initiatives, we question the NIH’s exclusion of LGBTQ identified individuals in their “interest in diversity.” Numerous studies demonstrate discrimination toward LGBTQ individuals in scientific contexts, and several demonstrate underrepresentation:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5851677/

This study finds that college students identifying as LGBTQ were 7% less likely than control students to remain in STEM majors after 4 years (n=4162).

http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/6/1/12

This study of six STEM related federal agencies (including the NSF) finds that LGBTQ-identified workers report across-the-board lower levels of workplace satisfaction and perceived treatment (n=37,219).

http://www.dl.begellhouse.com/journals/00551c876cc2f027,761a7b37493b2d86,6fe4cda94f55abdf.html

This study of LGBT faculty members across disciplines (n=279) found that many experienced exclusionary behavior and harassment, and a majority of LGBT STEM faculty surveyed considered leaving their institution as a result.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26241115

This survey of LGBTQ workers in STEM found that many work in environments they see as hostile to their identity, and most could not recall a single openly LGBTQ faculty member during their training (n=1427).

https://www.aps.org/programs/lgbt/

This report summarizes a few surveys of the climate for LGBTQ physicists. It finds that their experiences are highly variable across different locations, and that transgender or gender-nonconforming physicists experienced higher levels of isolation and harassment.

The NIH interest in diversity cites studies of similar scope and findings for underrepresentation of other minority groups, although these studies are more abundant. We wrote to the NIH Division of Biomedical Research Workforce to ask why they do not recognize that LGBTQ individuals are underrepresented in scientific disciplines. Here is their response:

Individuals who are from sexual and gender minority (SGM) groups have not been identified as underrepresented populations by the NSF.  The revised Notice of Interest in Diversity does not address SGM groups. It is certainly an issue of which NIH is mindful.

I agree wholeheartedly about the need to collect sexual orientation data for NIH researchers because without those data it is impossible to highlight LGBTQ as an underrepresented group. Our office has begun discussions with the Sexual & Gender Minority Research Office at NIH . As you may be aware, NIH does not currently have the authority to collect sexual orientation and gender identity questions for applicants at this time.  OMB has convened the Federal Interagency Working Group on Measuring Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (SOGI) to begin addressing concerns regarding the availability of data for sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations and the methodological issues in collecting such data.  The All of Us program is asking about sexual orientation but that is of study participants. The EPA and NIH have some pilot programs inquiring about employee sexual orientation to get at some of the SGM populations within federal workforce issue. As far as I’m aware, federal standards have not been developed regarding the collection of data regarding SGM populations.   I am hoping there is movement on this soon.

The working group cited (SOGI) completed their work in 2016, suggesting there is still no movement on even starting to collect the data that the NIH deems necessary to determine whether the LGBTQ community (or subsets within the community) are underrepresented in the NIH workforce. We feel that the NIH should not ignore peer-reviewed publications documenting discrimination against LGBTQ workers in the meantime.

The interest in diversity statement is also lacking in its treatment of intersectional minority groups, i.e. those who fall into two or more underrepresented groups. The statement mentions that women who have another minority status face additional challenges, but ignores other types of intersectionality. We feel the NIH is well behind current areas of diversity research and should work quickly to improve data collection and implementation of initiatives.